|
|
Post by admin on Aug 18, 2005 1:59:44 GMT -5
I've read the 6th of the Harry Potter series and it has quite a lot of young Tom Riddle scenes!
No spoilers for non readers don't worry.
I hope they will put more CCoulson scenes there.
*fingers crossed*
|
|
james12
New Member
-James-
Posts: 5
|
Post by james12 on Aug 19, 2005 1:41:01 GMT -5
It's a long time to wait isnt it? Potter 4 is now only post-production.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sus-Ana on Aug 19, 2005 8:22:06 GMT -5
We will have to see if they will re-cast Christian or not. Most people seem to be quite sure, but I'm not. Christian will be around 30 when they make the HBP film and I personally don't think he looks like Tom Riddle. He played Tom Riddle well in CoS though.
|
|
|
|
Post by kateweisz on Aug 19, 2005 8:28:35 GMT -5
yeah hes in all the flashbacks
thatll be fun
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Aug 19, 2005 8:36:36 GMT -5
Am not much a fan of the 6th book though. I thought it ruined Harry Potter. Nevertheless, the 16-year old memory of Voldemort remained unscathed  |
|
|
|
Post by kateweisz on Aug 19, 2005 8:50:47 GMT -5
i thought the 6th book was great
BUT the 7th and final one will be hard because JK is stepping into unknown terrain as in no hogwarts anymore
|
|
|
|
Post by Sus-Ana on Aug 19, 2005 8:57:21 GMT -5
I have mixed feelings about the 6th book. It was definitely better than the 5th though.
|
|
liz
Junior Member
<3 Prior
Posts: 61
|
Post by liz on Aug 20, 2005 11:36:25 GMT -5
Don't think he'll be in the movie. Don't want him to be in the movie. Book 6 was better than 5 but it still really annoyed me.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Aug 21, 2005 0:03:30 GMT -5
Aye to that, book 6 annoyed me too but book 5 was really good- besides the fact that harry's godfather died *rrrh*
I just thought there are too many lovey-dovey teenage nonsense in book 6.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sus-Ana on Aug 21, 2005 8:35:29 GMT -5
I just thought there are too many lovey-dovey teenage nonsense in book 6. Word! That annoyed the crap out of me.  |
|
|
|
Post by faeryprincess on Aug 23, 2005 3:21:38 GMT -5
The dumbledore thing was even less of an annoyance compared to Harry's "creature-who-longed-for-Ginny". I shudder to her use of allegory. I don't know perhaps I'm weird that way or possesive over this boy who lived but having girlfriends and silly crushes made him less of an "icon" or a "hero". First it was Cho and then Ginny...  That's why I prefer Lord Voldemort, he's only got one ambition and isn't a ninny when it comes to choosing his path. To me Harry is one confused little boy. |
|
liz
Junior Member
<3 Prior
Posts: 61
|
Post by liz on Aug 23, 2005 5:09:11 GMT -5
I think that was probably her idea, to make Harry seem more normal and less of a hero. But she took it a bit too far.
I agree, Voldie is far more interesting, as is Draco.
|
|
|
|
Post by erikausagi on Aug 23, 2005 14:16:50 GMT -5
yep, voldie is more interesting... we could change the name to Voldie & Harry?
|
|
|
|
Post by Masquerade on Aug 28, 2005 3:55:23 GMT -5
Loved the 6th book, but was disappointed with Ron/Lav. What happened to Ron/Hermione?! And Ginny/Harry = BLERGH!
I loved the flashbacks, though. and Harry being good at Potions was great fun.
As Sus-Ana said, yeah, CC might be too old to play the part. But we'll have to see who they cast, if they are indeed going to do the 6th film.
|
|
|
|
Post by justjumpalready on Aug 28, 2005 20:19:07 GMT -5
I hope they cast Christian. I liked book 6 but it was sad. I thought the romance was appropriate just becasue they are growing up and your focus changes when you get older.. it was a little overkill though, nevertheless, Im still really irked about the ron/Hermione deal also.
|
|
